<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reverse Engineering the Turing Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/science-fiction/turing-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/science-fiction/turing-test/</link>
	<description>Science Fiction Novelist, Blogger, Web Programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:03:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Instant Translation (David Louis Edelman&#8217;s Blog)</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/science-fiction/turing-test/comment-page-1/#comment-357</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Instant Translation (David Louis Edelman&#8217;s Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/?p=158#comment-357</guid>
		<description>[...] fool you into thinking it&#8217;s intelligent is in fact intelligent. (See my earlier screed about Turing tests and mind uploading.) In the same way, it seems to me that if you feed enough data into a pattern recognition [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fool you into thinking it&#8217;s intelligent is in fact intelligent. (See my earlier screed about Turing tests and mind uploading.) In the same way, it seems to me that if you feed enough data into a pattern recognition [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Sauve</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/science-fiction/turing-test/comment-page-1/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Sauve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/?p=158#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Three thoughts:

1. Ever since reading Robert Silverberg&#039;s &quot;Enter a Soldier. Later: Enter Another&quot;, I&#039;ve been convinced that Isaac Asimov will be one of the first re-created personalities.  Just feed his 500+ books in the machine and see what happens.

2. Be nice to your editors: they may be your ticket to a better reincarnated you.

3. Have a look at Don Foster&#039;s &lt;em&gt;Author Unknown&lt;/em&gt; for a good perspective on how individual writing styles  can be analysed and recognized.  It&#039;s hardly a perfect argument (he did identify Joe Klein as the author of &lt;em&gt;Primary Colors&lt;/em&gt;, but he eventually recanted his &quot;discovery&quot; of a lost Shakespeare poem), but it&#039;s the kind of thing to make all pseudonymous authors think twice about their chances of remaining unidentified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three thoughts:</p>
<p>1. Ever since reading Robert Silverberg&#8217;s &#8220;Enter a Soldier. Later: Enter Another&#8221;, I&#8217;ve been convinced that Isaac Asimov will be one of the first re-created personalities.  Just feed his 500+ books in the machine and see what happens.</p>
<p>2. Be nice to your editors: they may be your ticket to a better reincarnated you.</p>
<p>3. Have a look at Don Foster&#8217;s <em>Author Unknown</em> for a good perspective on how individual writing styles  can be analysed and recognized.  It&#8217;s hardly a perfect argument (he did identify Joe Klein as the author of <em>Primary Colors</em>, but he eventually recanted his &#8220;discovery&#8221; of a lost Shakespeare poem), but it&#8217;s the kind of thing to make all pseudonymous authors think twice about their chances of remaining unidentified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
