<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David Louis Edelman &#187; GF Willmetts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/tag/gf-willmetts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com</link>
	<description>Science Fiction Novelist, Blogger, Web Programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:17:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Grasping for the Wind: &#8220;MultiReal&#8221; the &#8220;Empire Strikes Back&#8221; of the Jump 225 Trilogy</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/book-news/gftw-and-sf-crowsnest-multireal-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/book-news/gftw-and-sf-crowsnest-multireal-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 13:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Louis Edelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MultiReal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GF Willmetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grasping for the Wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infoquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF Crowsnest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two new reviews for "MultiReal" have hit the web. The Grasping for the Wind blog compares the book to "The Empire Strikes Back," saying it's better than its predecessor; SFCrowsnest, meanwhile, criticizes the book for plot confusion and trying to stuff too much information between two covers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />Two new reviews for my new novel <a href="http://www.multireal.net/"><em>MultiReal</em></a> have hit the web.</p>
<p>Because this is my blog, I&#8217;ll start with <a href="http://otter.covblogs.com/archives/2008/06/book-review-multireal-by-david-louis-edelman.html">the review on the Grasping for the Wind blog</a>, which is about as good a review as one could hope for. <img style="float:right; margin:10px 0 10px 10px" title="\'MultiReal\' Book Cover" src="http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/wp-content/uploads/multireal-medium.jpg" alt="\'MultiReal\' Book Cover" />Here&#8217;s how John at Grasping for the Wind sums up the book:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>MultiReal</em> is an exciting and excellent sequel&#8230; This is one of those rare cases (like <em>The Empire Strikes Back</em> vs. <em>A New Hope</em>) where the second movie far surpasses the first in quality and level of enjoyment. Fans of stories that mix philosophy and ethics, with action and technology will enjoy Edelman&#8217;s works. It is a <em>Matrix</em> fans&#8217; delight, and a worthy successor to Orson Scott Card&#8217;s <em>Ender&#8217;s Game</em>. I highly recommend Edelman as an author, and suggest you read <em>Infoquake</em> and its sequel <em>MultiReal</em> if you are looking for high-octane action, deep thinking, and eloquent writing.</p></blockquote>
<p>John also praises the turn towards more action he sees in <em>MultiReal</em>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Edelman has maintained the high level of energy from the previous novel and even ratcheted it up a bit higher&#8230; Edelman relates the action with the same skill as the speeches and it is both exciting and epic. Some readers may feel that the way the MultiReal program is used by Natch and some of the other characters may be a little too similar the action of <em>The Matrix</em>. However, it is amazing that a probability program could have such far-reaching implications, and cause so much upset.</p></blockquote>
<p>Fair enough about the <em>Matrix</em> comparison. Unfortunately, the Wachowskis did such a good job with the concept of biologic software that it&#8217;s impossible to talk about the concept now <em>without</em> referring back to <em>The Matrix</em>. Kind of like you can&#8217;t write about a heroic quest without looking over your shoulder at J.R.R. Tolkien. Good thing I took out all of the stuff in the early drafts about Magan Kai Lee being a master of martial arts&#8230;</p>
<p>Finally, GFTW has some good things to say about my prose style in the book:</p>
<blockquote><p>The writing in <em>MultiReal</em> has also gotten more adventurous. Edelman is willing to try new ways of writing, including a whole chapter written as a letter from one character to another&#8230; [I]t shows that Edelman is willing to take chances with his writing. An author willing to push himself to new heights in style can only be doing the same in the substance of his story, reminding the reader that he or she will never really know what is around the next bend of the story.</p></blockquote>
<p>All the great things GFTW had to say about <em>MultiReal</em> took the sting out of <a href="http://www.computercrowsnest.com/articles/books/2008/nz12752.php">the review by the UK website SFCrowsnest</a>. Read it for yourself &#8212; it&#8217;s not good. I couldn&#8217;t find a single complimentary thing in GF Willmetts&#8217; review, not even enough for a blurb on the reviews page.</p>
<p>Willmetts starts off by complaining about plot confusion:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s been a little while since I read the first book, &#8216;Infoquake&#8217;, in the &#8216;Jump 225&#8242; trilogy and throwing myself in without a recap at the front of the book wasn&#8217;t a good idea&#8230; It wasn&#8217;t until I was a third of the way through the book that I spotted the recap as the first of eight appendixes&#8230; [M]uch of this information really needed to be incorporated within the confines of the story. It&#8217;s like looking at a painting and being told about what you haven&#8217;t seen. The skill in any storytelling is in putting the information in context and letting the picture build up in the reader&#8217;s mind. I frequently came away from reading this book thinking Edelman has internalised too much. He knows what is going on but hasn&#8217;t confided enough knowledge to the reader which is a big mistake. None of this is helped by the fact that he&#8217;s pushing so much material into the story that there is little room for the characters to breath so this time we don&#8217;t see so much depth with their personalities.</p></blockquote>
<p>Ouch. Willmetts elaborates from there, but it&#8217;s clear to me that the reviewer never recovered from his initial plot confusion and thus never invested in the story. Which is fair criticism.</p>
<p>This is a reaction I&#8217;ve long been expecting from some reviewers (but I won&#8217;t pretend it doesn&#8217;t still sting). The problem is that you&#8217;ll be totally in the woods trying to read <em>MultiReal</em> if you haven&#8217;t read <em>Infoquake</em> first. And even if you have, you&#8217;ll <em>still</em> be in the woods if you don&#8217;t remember it very well. <em>MultiReal</em> not only picks up soon after <em>Infoquake</em> leaves off, but it extends the themes and metaphors of that book, and makes references to things that happened in the margins of it. I tried to ameliorate this problem by including a four-and-a-half page synopsis of <em>Infoquake</em> in the appendices of <em>MultiReal</em>, but I knew that wasn&#8217;t going to please everybody.</p>
<p>For better or worse, I&#8217;ve written the entire trilogy to be read in close proximity, preferably in one long pass. In this I was inspired by the ballsy way that Peter Jackson handled <em>The Two Towers</em>. Lost? Confused? Tough. Go rent <em>The Fellowship of the Ring</em>, and come back when you&#8217;re done.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, as much as I think it&#8217;s worth your time to read <em>Infoquake</em> and <em>MultiReal</em> one after the other so you can pick up the delicate interplay of plot and metaphor, I can&#8217;t very well <em>insist</em> that you read them that way. Pyr would never go for it, because they&#8217;re planning to, you know, <em>sell</em> these things. All I can do is suggest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/book-news/gftw-and-sf-crowsnest-multireal-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

