<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David Louis Edelman &#187; Graeme&#8217;s Fantasy Book Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/tag/graemes-fantasy-book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com</link>
	<description>Science Fiction Novelist, Blogger, Web Programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:37:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>More Newfound Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/book-news/more-newfound-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/book-news/more-newfound-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Louis Edelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Book News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infoquake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1-star reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon reviewers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antiaging Wellness Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don d'Ammassa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graeme's Fantasy Book Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Larry: Chopper Shaman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/?p=1192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After seeing the rush of new reviews for "Infoquake," I decided to do a round of vanity Googling and found several more that I had been unaware of.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />After seeing the rush of new reviews for <em>Infoquake</em>, I decided to do a round of vanity Googling and found several more that I had been unaware of. Yes, I know how unusual it is for me to blog three times in one day. But don&#8217;t worry, after today I promise I&#8217;ll go back to sporadically throwing out blog pieces about random topics at no fixed interval.</p>
<p><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px" src="http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/wp-content/uploads/indian-larry.jpg" alt="Indian Larry: Chopper Shaman" width="275" height="350" />The book cover for <em>Indian Larry: Chopper Shaman</em> here has no relation to any of these book reviews. I just stumbled upon it while Googling and found it amusing. Tell me Indian Larry isn&#8217;t the coolest guy on the planet. Go ahead, <em>tell</em> me. No, I don&#8217;t believe you. You&#8217;re lying.</p>
<p>Now, the new reviews:</p>
<p><strong>Graeme Flory</strong> of <strong>Graeme&#8217;s Fantasy Book Review</strong> recently <a href="http://www.graemesfantasybookreview.com/2008/05/solaris-book-of-new-science-fiction.html">reviewed</a> <em>The Solaris Book of New Science Fiction, Volume Two</em>, and called my story <a href="/writing/mathralon/">&#8220;Mathralon&#8221;</a> one of his two favorites in the collection. &#8220;George Mann’s second collection of science fiction makes for some enthralling reading of other worlds and the people who inhabit them,&#8221; says Graeme. &#8220;&#8230;My favourite stories were Dan Abnett’s ‘Point of Contact’ and David Louis Edelman’s ‘Mathralon’, two tales that leave the reader in no doubt as to how cold and lonely our universe can be.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not really a review, but the <strong>Antiaging Wellness Blog</strong> uses <em>Infoquake</em> as a starting point for <a href="http://antiaging-wellness.com/Blog/?p=74">a brief essay</a> about biological programming. &#8220;In reading through the programs used in <em>Infoquake</em>, it is hard not to ask oneself, are these not the very mechanisms that the body is designed to control itself, through our hormonal and neurological pathways.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Don D&#8217;Ammassa</strong> apparently long ago posted <a href="http://www.dondammassa.com/R1zero.htm#Infoquake">a capsule outtake review</a> of <em>Infoquake</em>, which I completely failed to notice at the time. Says Don: &#8220;Lots of interesting speculation and a plausible and  interesting plot. I found the prose a bit awkward from time to time but not so  much that it significantly interfered with my enjoyment of the story.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some Amazon reviewer apparently has been using his copy of <em>Infoquake</em> as a makeshift Frisbee. Says <strong>Ray A.R. &#8220;Abe&#8221;</strong> in his <a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/R3DEYA2F8YXTAD/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm">1-star review</a>: &#8220;This is one of two supposedly highly rated books I read lately that were completely awful. I read the whole thing but wished I&#8217;d stopped after the third time I threw the book across the room. Take out the technojunk and this is nothing but a subpar novel, weak on character, weak on plot. Suffice to say I&#8217;ll never read another thing written by this awful author.&#8221; FYI, the other highly rated book that &#8220;Abe&#8221; disliked was Pat Rothfuss&#8217; <em>The Name of the Wind</em>.</p>
<p>Continuing my bad streak of reviews on the <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Infoquake/David-Louis-Edelman/e/9781591024422">Barnes &amp; Noble page for <em>Infoquake</em></a>, <strong>Karmen Roth</strong> echoes Abe&#8217;s sentiments about the book<em></em>: &#8220;<span class="hrbt-r">Very unoriginal, poorly written and chock full of junk technotalk that serves no purpose. By the end, there wasn&#8217;t a single character I cared about and the story didn&#8217;t seem to go anywhere.&#8221; To which I say: Oh yeah? Well, wait until you read <em>MultiReal</em>. It&#8217;s even <em>more</em> unoriginal, <em>more</em> poorly written, and <em>every single word</em> is junk technotalk that not only serves no purpose, but actively finds out <em>your</em> purpose and sabotages it.<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/book-news/more-newfound-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
