<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David Louis Edelman &#187; revising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/tag/revising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com</link>
	<description>Science Fiction Novelist, Blogger, Web Programmer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 13:19:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Purpose and Utility of Author Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/writing/purpose-of-author-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/writing/purpose-of-author-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Louis Edelman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stream-of-consciousness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/?p=1547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In which the author attempts to break his two-month-long silence on his blog by writing a semi-stream-of-conscious piece about his method and philosophy behind blogging.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="top" />Authors generally come in two varieties:</p>
<ol>
<li>Authors for whom writing comes easily and naturally</li>
<li>Authors for whom writing takes a tremendous amount of effort and concentration</li>
</ol>
<p>Which flavor am I? Well, here&#8217;s a clue: it&#8217;s taken me about five minutes to get this far in this blog piece already. I&#8217;ve rewritten the first sentence three or four times, backspacing before I even got to the colon. In this paragraph alone, I started off with &#8220;which camp do I fall in&#8221; before realizing that the camping metaphor clashes with the &#8220;two varieties&#8221; metaphor in the first paragraph above. (And now, here I am, re-reading through the article again two days after I started because I didn&#8217;t have time to finish it earlier.)</p>
<p><img style="float:right; margin:5px 0 10px 10px" title="Sketch of a writer smoking a pipe" src="http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/wp-content/uploads/writer-smoking-pipe.jpg" alt="Sketch of a writer smoking a pipe" width="350" height="303" />I&#8217;m slow. I&#8217;m not going to say that I <em>agonize</em> over my words, because that implies a degree of discomfort and displeasure in the process. But I certainly <em>concentrate intensely</em> on my words. They don&#8217;t just come gushing out. (Just changed &#8220;flowing&#8221; to &#8220;gushing.&#8221;)</p>
<p>And so when I find myself falling into a prolonged silence on my blog like the current two-month silence, it&#8217;s hard to get going again.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s especially difficult (changed from &#8220;hard&#8221;) when what I <em>really</em> should be concentrating on is finishing up the first draft of <em>Geosynchon</em>, the third book in the Jump 225 trilogy. I don&#8217;t do this writing thing full-time, and it&#8217;s difficult to find the time to blog. It&#8217;s about to become all the <em>more</em> difficult because I&#8217;m about to become a first-time parent. I have no idea how I&#8217;m going to find the time to write when I&#8217;ve got two squealing (changed from &#8220;screaming&#8221;) babies, and a bunch of bills that are overdue because I&#8217;ve forgotten to pay them, and a burning desire to occasionally have a, you know, <em>life</em>.</p>
<p>So how do I continue blogging on a regular or semi-regular basis?</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t help that I don&#8217;t approach blogging the way most bloggers approach blogging. Unlike, say, a newspaper column, the whole point of publishing a blog is that it&#8217;s immediate and unfiltered. Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m thinking today! Just saw Sarah Palin say something stupid on TV, boom, here&#8217;s my take on it! What did I think yesterday or last week or last month? Who cares? It&#8217;s all now, now, now!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always resisted the impulse to publish that kind of blog, just like I&#8217;ve always resisted the impulse to write those kinds of book. Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with the stream-of-consciousness technique; it&#8217;s just not me. I don&#8217;t <em>want</em> people to know what I&#8217;m thinking on a minute-by-minute basis. I don&#8217;t <em>want</em> to showcase my snapshot reactions to the latest flap in the news. Why? Because my off-the-cuff (changed from &#8220;snapshot&#8221;) reactions are just like everyone else&#8217;s. They&#8217;re tinged by raw emotion. They&#8217;re based on incomplete information. They&#8217;re predictable. They can get me into trouble.</p>
<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned, it&#8217;s the digested, reasoned, thought-through, considered response that matters. It&#8217;s the book that I&#8217;ve slaved over and over in draft after draft, carefully layering in plot and metaphor and theme like a pastry chef making phyllo dough. (Just stopped to look up &#8220;phyllo&#8221; on Wikipedia to make sure I wasn&#8217;t misremembering what phyllo is.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t resent the filter of editing, re-writing, re-thinking, and revising. I <em>need</em> that filter.</p>
<p>So if you&#8217;re planning on following my blog, you&#8217;re not going to get throwaways (with the exception of the occasional piece of self-promotion and/or book news) (just inserted that). You&#8217;re only going to get articles that have been well-thought-out and carefully crafted. You&#8217;re only going to get me writing about subjects I care about.</p>
<p><img style="float:left; margin:5px 10px 10px 0" title="The Thinker by Rodin" src="http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/wp-content/uploads/thinker.jpg" alt="The Thinker by Rodin" width="300" height="384" />The downside of this approach is that if I don&#8217;t have the time or inclination to ponder upon any particular subject, I&#8217;m not going to publish anything. I&#8217;m not going to fall back on a summary of my day or an interesting song lyric I&#8217;ve heard on the radio. Again, perfectly valid methods of blogging. Just not my method.</p>
<p>Sometimes I&#8217;ll take too long to ponder over a particular topic (changed from &#8220;a particular subject&#8221;, changed from &#8220;something&#8221;), and my meanderings on that topic will become outdated before I&#8217;ve even clicked the &#8220;Publish&#8221; button. These blog articles get saved onto my hard drive where they gather digital dust, unread. Thus, you probably will never read the 752-word-and-counting blog piece I&#8217;ve been writing about &#8220;The Bizarro Election&#8221; featuring my insights on Sarah Palin &#8212; because by the time I&#8217;m finished with it, the poor woman will (deleted &#8220;hopefully&#8221;) be on her way back to Alaska where she&#8217;ll become a 2018 trivia question for <em>Jeopardy</em> contestants.</p>
<p>All of this is a long-winded way of saying:</p>
<ol>
<li>No, I&#8217;m not dead;</li>
<li>No, I don&#8217;t even have the excuse of being a first-time parent yet;</li>
<li>Yes, I do intend to resume blogging on a regular basis; but</li>
<li>Yes, you&#8217;ll probably (just inserted &#8220;probably&#8221;) have to be patient.</li>
</ol>
<p>If you&#8217;re interested in reading what I&#8217;ve got to say about stuff and you don&#8217;t want to be bothered to check back on my blog page to see if I&#8217;ve published anything new, I invite you to sign up to subscribe by email (bottom of left column), or use the site RSS feeds.</p>
<p>Thanks, y&#8217;all.</p>
<p>*</p>
<p>(Now that I&#8217;ve finished the article, I&#8217;ve got to go back and re-read to make sure I&#8217;ve made a coherent point. I&#8217;ve got to make sure the title I&#8217;ve given the piece accurately reflects what&#8217;s in it, because I&#8217;ve been known to meander off course into totally different subjects.)</p>
<p>(And finally, I feel obligated to go hunt around for some pictures &#8212; generally of the humorous or ironic variety &#8212; to make the article visually interesting. So here I go&#8230; Okay, the Rodin <em>Thinker</em> statue is an obvious one, and it&#8217;s already in the blog media library. And for the second I&#8217;ll use one of my favorite sketches of a dude scribbling at a desk while smoking a pipe. Artist unknown, or at least I&#8217;m too lazy to look it up. Just have to do some quick image manipulation so the images fit onto the page&#8230; there.)</p>
<p>(Now, the final step. Save the article, and preview it. Re-read for last-minute typos and harebrained sentences that I&#8217;m going to regret later. Do last-minute tightening of the language. Make sure the pictures don&#8217;t create any funky link breaks&#8230; Done.)</p>
<p>(Don&#8217;t forget to add meta information for the search engines and the archive pages.)</p>
<p>(And finally&#8230; is this whole meta thing of the parenthetical asides too cutesy and John Barthish? Should I delete all these parenthetical comments about process? Hmm. Maybe. But I&#8217;m the kind of writer who likes to live life <em>on the edge</em>.)</p>
<p>(Have all of these parenthetical comments made this blog piece too long? Do I need another picture to fill up the space? No. Dude, stop. Just click the fucking &#8220;Publish&#8221; button already.)</p>
<p>(Publish.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davidlouisedelman.com/writing/purpose-of-author-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

